Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and Person Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The spot off connection into the person mating. Post on Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A beneficial. (2002). Sites contradiction reviewed. Journal regarding Social Circumstances, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Sites contradiction: A personal technical that decreases personal wedding and you may psychological well-getting? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Sphere, J. Meters. (2001). Amount, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces. Newest People Account, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies out-of intimacy, passion, and you can union: Evaluation the new presumptions of the triangular concept off like. Mental Reports, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Impact top from the undertaking bad: Social comparisons in this romantic dating. Diary from Personality and you may Personal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: This new implicit knowledge of intimate rivalry. Diary out-of Personality and Personal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
A great. (2001)mitment and matchmaking repair components
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. Good., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to glamorous solutions: Brand new advanced mindset regarding relationship repair. Progression and you can Peoples Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential investigation out of dispute and you can agreement in upset and you may nondistressed relationship couples. Diary out of Asking and you will Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A beneficial., Eco-friendly, An effective. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Matchmaking formation on line: What’s the larger interest? Diary out-of Public Affairs, 58(1), 9–31.
The great benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization https://getbride.org/da/etiopiske-kvinder/ and also the design out-of pleasure into the intimate relationship
Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-analysis motives in personal relationships: A type of around the globe improvement and specific verification. In P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Knowledge ents on the examination of pair telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College Drive.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-specialist thread through the contact of attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Idea, Lookup, Habit, Training, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The new public monitoring system: Improved awareness so you can public cues because a transformative response to social exception to this rule. Into the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The latest societal outcast: Ostracism, social exception, rejection, and intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Psychology Force.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the world and particular relational models throughout the connection with personal relationships. Log away from Character and Public Therapy, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you can information trying for the personal relationships. Personality and you may Personal Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can particular accessory representations from inside the adulthood: Is there a love?. Log Off Societal And private Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In J. Harvey & A great. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate personal dating: Maintenance and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection yourself impact among spouses since the a purpose of the fresh similarity within their common enjoy. Identification And Social Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Effects of salience away from extrinsic rewards into liking and you may enjoying. Diary out of Identification and you will Social Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.
No responses yet